您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
您现在所在的位置:首页
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
王伟光
    男,汉族,1950年2月出生,山东海阳人。1967年11月参加工作,1972年11月加入中国共产党,博士研究生学... 详情>>
李 扬
    1951年9月出生,籍贯安徽,1981年、1984年、1989年分别于安徽大学、复旦大学、中国人民大学获经济学学... 详情>>
李培林
    男,山东济南人。博士,研究员,中国社会科学院副院长,中国社会学会副会长,中国社会科学院社会学研究所副所长。《社会... 详情>>

    城市化率达到50%以后 拉美国家的经济、社会和政治转型

    摘要

    拉美地区的城市化率达到50%以后,其城市化进程最突出的特点是“快”,20世纪60年代初至2013年城市化率实现了“三级跳”,1950~2000年2万人以上城市的人口几乎翻了三番。在城市化进程中,拉美地区的经济转型有两大突出特点。第一,城市化水平高于经济发展水平,“过度城市化”和“中等收入陷阱”现象较为明显,工业进程停滞和家庭消费受到抑制则是导致这两大现象的主要因素。第二,形成了四大经济部门,即农村经济部门、外资经济部门、城市非正规经济部门和城市正规经济部门。围绕着工作、住房、社会保障三个支点,拉美国家的社会转型有两大突出特点。第一,形成了两大社会关系和三大社会阶层。两大社会关系是指以城市社区为基础的“社缘关系”和以劳动分工、职业划分、共同利益为基础的“职缘关系”。拉美地区的社会割裂现象较为突出,社缘关系的横向割裂和职缘关系的纵向割裂是其重要原因。三大社会阶层是指非正规阶层、正规阶层和精英阶层,使得拉美地区的社会结构表现为金字塔形结构。第二,一对矛盾,即国家与社会的矛盾。围绕着这一对矛盾,拉美地区形成了“三支柱”社会凝聚和社会管理框架。在政治转型方面,拉美地区完成了由民众主义政治向政党政治的转型。在政治转型进程中,经济国际化、利益集团化、社会分层化、政治精英化、政府社会化交织在一起。本文总结了“一二三四五”这一观察和认识拉美国家的基本框架。“一”是指“一对矛盾”,即国家与社会的对立;“二”是指两大社会关系,即社缘关系和职缘关系;“三”是指三大社会阶层,即精英阶层、正规阶层和非正规阶层;“四”是指四个经济部门,即农村经济部门、外资经济部门、城市正规经济部门和城市非正规经济部门;“五”是指“五化”,即经济国际化、利益集团化、社会分层化、政治精英化、政府社会化。借助于这个框架,可以较为透彻地认识土地的三项基本功能、发展中的“后工业化社会”陷阱、非正规住房的“后遗症”、公民社会的困境等问题。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    From the beginning of the 1960’s to 2013,Latin America achieved the triple-jump of the urbanization. Between 1950 and 2000,the number of cities with population over 20 000 increased by almost 8 times. As a result of the urbanization process,the region realized an economic transformation with two features. First,the level of urbanization continued to be higher than that of economic development. “Over-urbanization” and “Middle-income Trap” are two major phenomena. The stagnated industrialization and the suppressed household consumption are the basic reasons for them. Second,there emerged the rural economic sector,the foreign capital economic sector,the formal economic sector of urban area,and the informal economic sector of urban area. On the whole,the social transformation in the region has two main characters. First,two social relations (based on community and profession respectively) and three social classes (elite,formal and informal) got concreted. The social fragmentation is a special phenomenon in Latin America. The community-based social relation and the profession-based social relation have horizontal and vertical impacts on fragmentation respectively. As a result of the three social classes,the social structure in the region is pyramidal. Second,there has existed the contradiction between state and society. Some Latin American countries have been practicing the “3-pillars” frame of social cohesion and social management. As for the political transformation,the region has finished the process of transforming from populist politics to party politics. In the process of political transformation,the region witnessed the internationalization of economy,the differentiation of interest groups,the stratification of society,the solidification of political elite,and the socialization of government. The article summarizes one basic frame for observing and investigating Latin American countries,which is “12345”. “1” represents one contradiction,which is the contradiction between state and society. “2” represents two social relations,including the community-based and the profession-based social relations. “3” represents three social classes,which are the elite,formal and informal classes. “4” represents four economic sectors,which are the rural economic sector,the foreign capital economic sector,the formal economic sector of urban area,the informal economic sector of urban area. “5” represents five “actions”,which are the internationalization of economy,the differentiation of interest groups,the stratification of society,the solidification of political elite,and the socialization of government.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    谢文泽:谢文泽,经济学博士,中国社会科学院拉丁美洲研究所副研究员,主要研究领域为拉美“三农”、产业经济、城市化和收入分配、安第斯国家经济、巴西经济等。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告