北京大学设立燕京学堂,成为2014年教育界的一个重要事件。燕京学堂项目的设置是我国大学的行政权力随着资本大量涌入而得到强化的产物。“国际化”是大学行政权力建设世界一流大学的重要动力和措辞,燕京学堂的国际化直接涉及人文学科,国际化的倾向同人文学科的知识特征存在张力,因而引发了相关学者的强烈质疑。此外,围绕燕京学堂“中国学硕士”的争论体现出中国学科与专业设置的制度性捆绑。由于教学专业或项目的设置常常对应着单一的学科,因而诸如“东亚研究”的多学科领域在美国的大学可以顺利扩张,这并不能简单用作“中国学”在中国顺利制度化的合法理由。
<<The establishment of Yenching Academy in Peking University was a noticeable event in 2014. According to the claim of Peking University,Yenching Academy was a new move to build world top universities and to improve internationalization. This paper contended the establishment of Yenching Academy indicated the administrative power strengthened while the more and more capitals flowing into universities. Internationalization is a powerful driving force and rhetorical discourse for administrative system to build world top universities. There is tension between the international idea and the characteristics of knowledge production in humanities,which results in fierce discussion and debate among scholars. In addition,the dispute about master program of Chinese Studies indicated the idea about the discipline and program in China,where there was tight connection between a discipline to a program. The institutionalization of multidisciplinary field in America,for example East Asian Studies,in the form of research centers and program,could not be used as persuasive argument in legitimation of Yenching Academy.
<<Keywords: | InternationalizationAdministrative powerYenching AcademyAcademic DisciplineInstruction Program |