人权问题常成为国际追逃过程中遣返、引渡工作的障碍。美洲人权法院审理的中国公民黄海勇诉秘鲁案典型地反映了中国境外追逃工作面临的挑战和问题。在此案的审理过程中,中国专家证人通过提供书面证词和出庭作证,协助秘鲁政府应诉,成功反驳了原告方的相关主张。2015年6月,法院判决由于不存在死刑和酷刑风险,秘鲁政府可以将黄海勇引渡回中国。这是美洲人权法院关于引渡框架下国家保障人权义务的首个案例,对于接受法院管辖的国家有直接的法律效力,对欧洲人权法院等区域性人权司法机构和其他国家和地区也具有一种启示作用。作为既有案例,美洲人权法院在此案中总结和运用的法理在国际法和国内法上都具有重要的影响和启示。
<<Human rights issues very often become the obstacles for repatriation or extradition in the international persons chasing in anti-corruption process. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case Wong Ho Wing vs. Peru typically reflects the challenges and problems faced with by the Chinese authority. In this Case,three expert witnesses from China provided the Court written opinions concerned,and two of them appeared before the Court and helped the Peru Government’s representatives. In June,2015,The Court decided that Mr. Wong could be extradited to China without real risks of death penalty or torture. It is the first case of the Court on extradition and States’ human rights obligations. It is of direct legal effects for the Member States of the Court,and of significances to the other regional human rights courts like the European Court of Human Rights and other countries and places. As a precedent,the jurisprudence concluded and applied by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in this Case is enlightening as well in both international law and domestic law.
<<