与我国NPO(非营利组织)建设的启动时间大致相同,日本NPO的发展却领先于我国。究其原因,除了1998年NPO法的实施之外,还在于日本从中央到地方实施了一系列NPO配套政策。为此,论文将日本NPO制度视为一个政策体系,通过统计和分析内阁府和地方自治体的NPO政策文本,采用归纳推理方法,探讨其指导理念、中央与地方政府的政策内容与社会影响、主要课题及未来走向。研究表明:日本已大致构建起NPO政策的指导理念——“新公共性”;内阁府实施的名为“‘新公共’推进会议”和“新公共支援事业”的NPO政策,虽然面临诸如政权频繁更替下政策延续性的确保、中央与地方之间政策协调性的强化以及防止政策蜕变为“官办项目”等课题,但因其指导理念——“新公共性”具备社会基础及实施过程中市民力量得以确保,内阁府实施的两项NPO政策将得以较为顺利地推行;各地方自治体相继实施以“支援条例”、“支援指南”、“支援设施”、“基金制度或协动事业”、“信息网络中心”为政策形态的NPO政策并取得较高的实施率。尽管其存在诸如中央与地方之间政策合作的推进、地方自治体次级分权及“协动失灵”和“协动手段化”等课题,但“分权型社会”的确立以及“地方对地方”格局的形成将大大提高以“协动”为载体的NPO政策之实施率。基于日本的经验,我国应努力构建符合中国国情的NPO政策指导理念并将NPO建设作为社会建设的重中之重、中央政府层面应尽快推进我国NPO相关基本法制的改革与完善、积极鼓励和推动地方政府在NPO政策创新中发挥应有的功能与作用。
<<When China’s NPOs were just emerging,Japan’s NPOs were far ahead in their development. In terms of the reasons,besides Japan’s implementation of an NPO Law in 1998,Japan also rolled out a set of complementary policies at the federal and local levels. Accordingly,this article treats Japan’s NPO system as a policy system. Employing both quantitative analysis of the NPO policies of cabinet offices and local autonomous administrative entities as well as inductive reasoning,the article discusses the policy system’s guiding principles and content,the impacts of the central and regional governments,and the future direction of the system. The study finds that Japan has already generally established a guiding principle for NPOpolicy-a “new publicism”(“新公共性”)and that cabinet offices have implemented NPO programs entitled “‘New Publicism’ Advancement Meetings” and “New Publicism Assistance Work”. Problems such as policy consistency from administration to administration,policy coordination between central and local governments,and policies morphing into “official projects” may still persist. Yet,because it has a strong guiding concept,is laid on strong social foundations and galvanizes citizens’ powers,“new publicism” has been notable for how smoothly its implementation has proceeded. Autonomous local bodies have passed “assisting regulations”,“assisting guides”,“assisting measures”,“fund systems and joint work plans”,“information network centers” and other measures in order to ensure a high rate of implementation of NPO policies. Though problems with orchestrating central and local policy and squabbles over powers between the lower levels of government may sometimes result in “joint action failures” or “joint action maneuvering”,the establishment of “division of powers” in society and formation of competition between localities will increase the degree of implementation of an NPO policy carried forward by the vehicle of “joint action”. Based on Japan’s experiences,China should endeavor to establish a guiding concept for its NPO policies consistent with the needs of China’s situation. In addition,a very high priority should be placed on NPO-building within the greater project of society building. At the central government level,China should hasten to reform and improve basic laws concerning NPOs. In addition,local levels of government should be actively encouraged to play a role in creating innovations in the area of NPO policy.
<<