本文通过对一个艾滋病论坛的网络民族志,来研究身负艾滋污名的个体如何策略性地进行话语抗争。研究发现,关于艾滋病的在线话语抗争至少包含四种策略:用“慢性病”替代“瘟疫”或“传染病”的命名,试图建构不带有道德色彩的艾滋病知识体系;将患病编织于命定逻辑中,弱化自己的行为责任,回避可能蒙受的道德指责;强调“性乱”的亚文化特征,认为性自由是人性自由的一种形式;为“同性恋”正名,以“爱”为线索,以“宽容”为口号,建构符合同性恋群体利益的感染叙事。
<<Based on an ethnographic study of an AIDS online forum,this passage tried to reveal how the stigma individuals made discourse resistance. Study found that at least four strategies were used:to name AIDS as “chronic disease” instead of “plague” or “infectious disease”,constructing new AIDS knowledge system;to wave the ill in the logic of destiny,reducing the responsibility for their own behavior;to emphaze the sub culture feature of “promiscuity”,through stating the view that sex freedom is a form of human nature freedom;to rectify the name of “homosexuality”,constructing infection narrative to the interests of gay with “love” as a clue and “tolerance” as a slogan.
<<